B.C. Supreme Court judge upheld $400,000 of damages award to Civeo Corp. against Unite Here, Local 40, but upheld union’s appeal for $100,000 in punitive damages
Article content
A B.C. labour union is on the hook for at least $400,000 in damages for defaming a company that provides housing for the oilpatch, after the union claimed the company hadn’t hired enough Indigenous workers at a Kitimat facility.
Article content
Civeo Corp. filed a grievance in 2021 against Unite Here, Local 40, which represents people who work in the Kitimat facility, saying a website posting had defamed the company and affected its relations with Indigenous people.
Article content
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
The union posted the statement, which was headlined “Civeo’s broken promises to First Nations people,” after Civeo refused to negotiate an increase in wages and benefits outlined in a letter of understanding, according to B.C. Supreme Court Justice Marla Morellato who ruled on the union’s appeal from an earlier arbitration finding.
Article content
Sunrise
Article content
Both sides agreed the letter of understanding didn’t compel either party to renegotiate the settled terms, it said.
Article content
Civeo’s Indigenous employees testified before an arbitration hearing that they were offended by the term “broken promises,” saying it was hurtful and offensive.
Article content
The arbitrator concluded the union published “completely false” statements about Civeo and found its conduct amounted to “extreme bad faith in the administration, application and performance of the collective agreement.”
Article content
The arbitrator relied on testimony from Trevor Gladue, Civeo’s director of Indigenous strategic initiative, who said the term “broken promises” has rightfully been used to describe past injustices, such as those stemming from residential schools.
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
“But using those words against me and our company — it’s hurtful,” he told the arbitrator who first heard the case and granted the damages.
Article content
Read More
Article content
“It’s calling me a sellout. I’m a token Indian. I’ve never had that said to me — ever. I am emotional,” said Gladue, according to the court judgment. “I’m nervous about today. … Natives being used as a whipping tool again. So it’s hurtful. The statement is completely inaccurate.”
Article content
“I get it. The union is fighting for its members and for improved wages,” he said. But, “when the term ‘broken promises’ is used, it strikes hard.”
Article content
He said the impact of the union’s website statement on Civeo’s reputation and business was “deep and profound.”
Article content
He said news among First Nations spreads by the “moccasin telegraph” and “we are now on defence, because of this. It has a reverberation which is hard to rebound from.”
Article content
Ashley Hinton, an Indigenous woman who works for Civeo, said the union’s statement made her “angry” because the union was using it as a “catchphrase.”
Article content
“It is not a phrase to be used lightly,” especially at a time when the Truth and Reconciliation Commission report shone light on the missing women on the Highway of Tears in Northern B.C. and the residential school issues. “But it was. The phrase was thrown out there on the website.”
