Are the New England Patriots sellers at the NFL trade deadline?
On Nov. 1, Sports Illustrated’s Albert Breer highlighted defensive tackle Christian Barmore and cornerback Carlton Davis as potential Patriots trade candidates ahead of Tuesday’s deadline at 4 p.m. According to Breer, if a deal is struck, New England’s motivation would be centered around adding draft capital and transitioning into a younger roster.
Advertisement
As of Nov. 4, head coach Mike Vrabel appeared to disagree with that approach.
“I think sometimes national reports have the tendency to do that. I have not shared that information with anybody,” Vrabel said. “This time of year, I think that all these things kind of get drummed up. So, we’re focused on trying to prepare for [the Green Bay Packers] and make the corrections from [the week before].
“This is business as normal here, so I don’t know where a lot of these things come from. Certainly not from any conversations with me.”
However, does Vrabel and Co.’s stance about handling the trade deadline change after New England’s brutal 45-27 loss at the hands of the Packers on Sunday?
Advertisement
Vrabel offered a simple response when making an appearance on WEEI’s The Greg Hill Show: “No.”
“We want a bunch of guys that want to be here,” he added. “That want to make it hard on each other. In preparation, push each other, challenge each other, improve, take accountability, and if that’s not them, then let us know by tomorrow. That’s what we have to do. That’s the mindset.”
And from a selling standpoint, his ruling could make sense as a final decision.
Regardless of whether or not the Patriots strike a deal involving either Barmore or Davis, trading almost any impact contributor on the roster while sitting at a 5-4 record at the regular season’s midway point, especially in the AFC, is certainly questionable. Both players were also members of the tight-knit group that made a Super Bowl appearance just nine months ago.
Advertisement
At the least, a deal of that stature calls for a corresponding “buying” move.
Sure, New England’s depth in multiple areas will be a largely discussed topic throughout the offseason regarding the team’s roster-building process. And rightfully so.
Vrabel said it himself after a preseason victory over the Philadelphia Eagles, stating at the time that he doesn’t think his team is “very deep.”
But six 2027 day-three draft picks make finding immediate, injury-relieving depth manageable. Sending away either Barmore or Davis simply doesn’t make sense at this time. Especially for a franchise still technically in contention for the AFC East title.
Advertisement
In 2023, Barmore posted his best season as a pro, recording 8.5 sacks, 16 quarterback hits and pressuring those passers 49 times. He also consistently disrupted opposing run offenses, forcing 13 tackles for a loss and totaling 64 combined takedowns.
That season-long performance earned the Patriots’ 2021 second-round draft selection a four-year, $84 million contract extension the following offseason.
Currently in year two of that new deal, Barmore’s production hasn’t entirely matched the monetary value of his contract, especially in run defense. From just last season, the 27-year-old has seen his involvement in that facet of the defense drop from 62.8% to just 36%.
Advertisement
Still, New England evidently continues to view Barmore as a producer when rushing the quarterback, heavily using the defensive tackle during pass-rush downs and critical third-down plays.
Barmore’s overall reduced role also doesn’t mean he’s expendable. Trading him shuffles the defensive line, forcing Cory Durden into a new, pass-rush-heavy role and 34-year-old DaQuan Jones, who has contributed as a relief piece for the primary starters, into a heavier workload.
As for Davis, the cornerback hasn’t shown signs of regression. But the soon-to-be 30-year-old, entering the final year of his contract with a mighty injury history and owed $22 million in 2027, plays directly into the youth-movement argument.
Advertisement
Nonetheless, shipping him off to another franchise creates a glaring hole in the cornerback room. That decision then forces Vrabel and the defensive coaching staff to decide between starting substitute Charles Woods opposite Christian Gonzalez or pulling Marcus Jones away from his natural nickel-cornerback position.
With several offenses in the Patriots’ remaining schedule currently ranking top 10 in passing yards per game, that potential decision seems counterproductive.
Davis, who recently returned to the starting lineup last week after missing four games, played a significant role in New England’s divisional round victory against the Houston Texans in the playoffs last season, intercepting C.J. Stroud twice.
In Barmore’s case, an eventual deal appears likely. As the Boston Herald’s Andrew Callahan put it, the Patriots seemingly want “out of the Barmore business.”
Advertisement
On Friday, Breer wrote that the price for both Barmore and Davis “would likely” be around just a fourth-round selection.
An offseason deal, rather than a midseason trade, allows New England greater flexibility to reallocate resources and explore replacements to replicate or improve upon either player’s production while spending less.
The Patriots’ loss to Green Bay is concerning. Still, it’s not a season-ending sign.
It’s true that New England’s defense has struggled to deliver on the expectations surrounding their offseason additions of Dre’Mont Jones, All-Pro safety Kevin Byard and second-round pick Gabe Jacas. But much like the rest of the roster, that group has dealt with injuries.
Advertisement
The team’s matchup against the Miami Dolphins in Week Eight marked the first game the starting cornerback trio of Gonzalez, Davis and Jones all played together since Week Three.
Even though eventually moving Barmore or another established contributor makes sense for the team’s long-term roster construction, the Patriots’ timing of a potential trade should account for the franchise’s current position in the AFC playoff picture.
