New Democrats may welcome this week’s relief from months of political imbroglio. But it could spell longer-term uncertainty.
Article content
VICTORIA — Attorney General Niki Sharma sounded like she’d been handed a lifeline this week after the Supreme Court of Canada let stand a lower court finding that Aboriginal title cannot be applied to private property in New Brunswick.
Article content
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal had ruled that “a declaration of Aboriginal title over privately owned lands … would sound the death knell of reconciliation with the interests of non-Aboriginal Canadians.”
Article content
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
The B.C. government took a similar line in disputing the B.C. Supreme Court award of Aboriginal title to the Cowichan Nation over hundreds of hectares of private land in Richmond.
Article content
Article content
“It is important for people to know that essentially, our arguments are what the court found in New Brunswick — the arguments that the province made here about private property being protected,” Sharma told reporters Thursday.
Article content
“It’s an interesting state right now where the Supreme Court of Canada has decided to not take a look at that law, so as not to overturn that decision in New Brunswick when it is the same legal issues that we’re dealing with here.”
Article content
Sharma’s comments were echoed by Geoffrey Moyse, formerly a legal counsel in the Attorney General Ministry and lately a critic of the B.C. government approach on Aboriginal title and Indigenous reconciliation.
Article content
“The fact that the Supreme Court of Canada has denied leave is hugely helpful,” Moyse told Rob Buffam of CTV. “The New Brunswick Court of Appeal has decided the issue somewhat differently, quite differently, than the trial judge in the Cowichan case.”
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
Also supportive were the comments from the federal Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations.
Article content
Read More
-
Vaughn Palmer: DRIPA troubles dragging down David Eby’s government
-
Vaughn Palmer: B.C. premier dances rather than admitting DRIPA means co-government
-
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
Article content
“The court found that Aboriginal title could not be declared over privately owned lands,” said spokesperson Rebecca Alty. “This decision will inform arguments in other cases, such as the Cowichan case in British Columbia.”
Article content
A more sobering perspective was provided by Dwight Newman, professor of constitutional law at the University of Saskatchewan and a regular commentator on Indigenous litigation here in B.C.
Article content
“The outcome in the (New Brunswick) case is moderately positive for those hoping to see a change in the Cowichan result. But only moderately so,” he wrote Friday on his Law for Breakfast site. “
Article content
“The New Brunswick decision is not binding in B.C. British Columbia’s courts could yet go a different path than the New Brunswick court did, and then the Supreme Court of Canada may have to look at everything again.
Article content
“Moreover, the New Brunswick decision says only that the outcome of Aboriginal title litigation cannot be a title declaration over privately owned lands,” continued Newman.
