Watch: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Silence on Mistrial in Murder Case
Three jurors in Lindsay Clancy‘s murder trial are sharing what really happened during deliberations.
The jurors—identified as Roni Carlson, a fifth grade special needs teacher; Kellie Farina, a chef; and Paula Devlin, who worked for government contractors—spoke out for the first time since a judge declared a mistrial on Sept. 4, slamming one unnamed male juror who held out on an otherwise unanimous verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.
“He was very arrogant,” Devlin told NBC10 Boston in an interview published Sept. 8. “He really did not take anything that anybody said. He tried to ask a question about the medications, and we went back to the report from South Shore Hospital.”
She explained that there were nurses on the jury who explained the toxicology report, but “he just completely disregarded the information that they gave.”
While Clancy admitted to killing her and then-husband Patrick Clancy’s children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, in 2023, the 12 jurors were not able to agree on whether she was guilty of murder, since her lawyer argued that the former labor-and-delivery nurse wasn’t in her right mind due to postpartum psychosis.
“He had reasonable doubt. He admitted he had reasonable doubt after we watched that video of the interview—I think that’s when it was,” recalled Carlson, the foreperson, of the holdout juror. “I started filling out the forms. I was so excited.”
Carlson began completing the paperwork for the verdict and added her signature; however, “then he said, ‘But I’m still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.'”
Greg Derr/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
The third juror explained how the man separated himself from the other members of the jury.
“I’m not sure if rogue is the right word,” Farina told the outlet. “But every one of us, in the hours of frustration, would get up and walk the room because you just couldn’t sit anymore, and we’d all go into the cart with the exhibits. He got up to the cart once, very briefly, and went back to his seat. He would not interact with us and try to understand.”
Farina said the jurors read the definition of reasonable doubt to him “numerous times.”
“He actually said one day in the end, ‘Well, why don’t we have the judge come in and read it again?’ And we were like, ‘No, we have it in front of us. We don’t need that,’ and we would highlight it,” she continued. “But he had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”
Read on for more revelations from Clancy’s murder trial.
David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Matt Stone/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images
David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool
David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect
Matt Stone/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images
Jonathan Wiggs/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Photo by David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Photo by Jonathan Wiggs/The Boston Globe via Getty Images
Mel Musto/Getty Images
