Close Menu
    Subscribe
    Entertainment

    JonBenét Ramsey’s Brother Burke Shares “Best Chance” at Solving Murder

    soreceryBy No Comments15 Mins Read

    Watch: JonBenét Ramsey’s Dad Responds to Claim She’s in Epstein Files

    JonBenét Ramsey‘s brother has not given up on the search for her killer nearly three decades later.

    Breaking his 10-year public silence, Burke Ramsey detailed his belief that DNA belonging to an “unknown male intruder” found on his slain sister’s underwear and beneath her finger may be “the best evidence we have.”

    “We need to find that match,” he told the Daily Mail in an interview published Nov. 5. “It’s probably the person who did it, you know, and it’s the best chance we have to solve this.”

    “And I want it solved,” the 39-year-old continued. “I don’t know much about the scientific nitty-gritty and it’s hard to learn the details of the case, because it is emotionally taxing. But they need to send those samples to different labs again and keep testing.”

    He added, “Find the match. That will go a long way to bringing justice.”

    Burke was 9 years old when his sister JonBenét, 6, was reported missing from their family’s Colorado home on Dec. 26, 1996. Her body was eventually found in the basement, with her cause of death ruled as asphyxia by strangulation and blunt head trauma.

    read

    Unpacking Why the JonBenét Ramsey Murder Case Has Never Been Solved

    In 2003, Burke and his parents, John Bennett Ramsey and the late Patsy Ramsey, were ruled out as contributors to the unknown DNA discovered on JonBenét. And though Burke in particular has been the subject of many online theories, he and the Ramsay family has long denied his involvement in his sister’s death.

    ZUMA Archive/ZUMA Wire

    Aside from DNA evidence, which John alleged in 2024 hadn’t been tested, investigators through the years have also homed in on a handwritten ransom note for $118,000 found in the Ramseys’ family home on the day of JonBenét disappearance. 

    For John, now 82, he believes the note is an important clue to his daughter’s unsolved murder.

    “One of the theories that I came up with,” he shared in a 20/20 in unearthed in 2024, “that it was close to the net amount I’d received that year as a bonus.”

    John surmised that the number “means something” to the murderer.

    “Whether that’s tied to my bonus or something else, we don’t know,” he added. “Only the killer knows.”

    In the decades since her shocking death, the unsolved JonBenét case has continued to be the subject of public fascination. For more inside the tragedy and its long aftermath, keep reading…

    Michael Smith/Newsmakers

    A Contaminated SceneAfter Patsy Ramsey called 911 at 5:52 a.m. on Dec. 26, 1996, to report that her daughter JonBenét Ramsey had been kidnapped, she and husband John Ramsey also reached out to a number of their friends, who came right over to support the couple.In turn, in addition to responding officers, there were people milling around the Ramseys’ 5,000-square-foot home all day before John found JonBenét’s body in the basement shortly after 1:30 p.m.”I should have removed all those people from the scene, that was a crime scene mistake,” retired Boulder Police Detective Bob Whitson recalled in the Netflix docuseries Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey. “But, at the time, it looked like a legitimate kidnapping. So, I thought, Well, these are the support system for the Ramseys, and I let ’em stay.”Not knowing she was dead when he found her, John said in the series he at first tried to untie the cord that bound her hands. The knots were too tight, he said, but he did remove a piece of duct tape that was covering her mouth and tossed it onto a blanket that had been with the body.He then carried her upstairs, which, according to investigators, ensured that the evidence collected from her body, the pajamas she was wearing, the tape, etc., was contaminated.”There may have been some evidence on the duct tape if that wasn’t removed,” Whitson said in the series.

    ZUMA Archive

    Two Faulty SearchesPolice who responded to Patsy’s 911 call searched the three upper levels of the Ramseys’ home, and the basement, but it wasn’t until a detective suggested that John do another sweep of the house nearly eight hours later that her body was found in a part of the basement that used to be a coal room.”One of the cops did not open the door where JonBenét was lying,” Fox News’ Carol McKinley, who covered the case at the time, said in the Netflix series. “Major mistake, and I believe he lives with that to this day.”Retired Boulder PD Commander John San Agustin noted in the series, “You never have someone outside of law enforcement doing a search.”However, when John looked in the coal room, he said, “Her body was right there in front of me.”

    © ABL Studio/ZUMAPRESS.com

    JonBenét Ramsey’s Pageant HistoryIn a pre-Toddlers and Tiaras world, the media incredulously spotlighted JonBenét’s participation in children’s beauty pageants, with most of the commentary being of the what-sort-of-mother-lets-her-child-parade-around-like-that variety.Having competed and performed at local events since she was 4, there were myriad photos of JonBenét wearing a full face of makeup and videos that became Rorschach tests for critics of the Ramseys who were looking for signs of sexual abuse or other trauma behind the child’s precocious poise.And people who claimed to have diagnosed as much had no qualms saying it on TV, the Netflix series including a clip from Geraldo in which a woman identified as a “well-known expert in child abuse” described one of JonBenét’s performances as masturbatory. (Host Geraldo Rivera was staging a mock trial on his show, during which a six-person “jury” found Patsy liable for her daughter’s death. “I went to bed for about two days,” she said in the 1998 documentary The Ramseys vs. The Media, “because I just was mortified.”)Reflecting on his enthusiastic coverage of the case, Rivera told the Chicago Tribune in 2006, “Everyone I came in contact with was talking about the Ramsey case, whether it was my nanny or the people in the neighborhood or the guy that takes care of my koi pond.” Even his mom wanted the details, he added, so “when it gets to that level, you know it has an interest that’s almost universal.”

    Helen H. Richardson/ The Denver Post

    The pageant commentary painted the Ramseys as “delinquent parents,” recalled Paula Woodward, an investigative reporter for KUSA Denver who covered the case from the beginning.She interviewed JonBenét’s pediatrician at the time, the journalist said, “He told me, no, she’s never had any sexual abuse in her life. He would have lost his medical license if he ever lied about that.”In a 1997 interview, the doctor said there was “never any hint whatsoever of sexual abuse. I didn’t see any hint of emotional abuse, or physical abuse. She was a very much-loved child.”But, as seen on tabloid covers shown in the series, there was plenty of speculation that the child may have been abused in lieu of evidence to allege that she really was.”Let me address it very directly: I did not kill my daughter JonBenét,” John told reporters during a May 1, 1997, news conference. “There have been innuendos that she had been or was sexually molested. I can tell you that those were the most hurtful innuendos to us as a family. They are totally false. JonBenét and I had a very close relationship. I will miss her dearly the rest of my life.”Added Patsy, “I’m appalled that anyone would think that John or I would be involved in such a hideous, heinous crime. But let me assure you that I did not kill JonBenét and did not have anything to do with it. I loved that child with the whole of my heart and soul.”

    Rick Maiman/Sygma via Getty Images

    The Ramseys’ Questionable SilenceJonBenét was laid to rest in Atlanta next to her half-sister Beth Ramsey (one of John’s three grown children from his first marriage, she died in a car accident in 1992) on Dec. 31, 1996.By then, the family had a spokesperson releasing statements to the media and had hired a lawyer.Which, at the time, “smelled a little funny,” Fox News’ McKinley said in the series. “And we were like, ‘What is going on?'”John said in the series, however, that their attorneys had advised them to be careful about anything they said or did. “But we gave the police everything they asked for,” John said. “Blood samples, DNA samples, whatever they asked for. Records, all our credit card [records], anything they asked for, we gave it to them.”Meanwhile, he added, “I would’ve been happy to die, quite frankly, to relieve the pain.”But with the media filling in the blanks so long as the Ramseys remained silent, soon enough friends in Boulder advised them to grant an interview ASAP, John recalled. So he and Patsy sat down with CNN on Jan. 1, 1997.

    Axel Koester/Sygma/Sygma via Getty Images

    “There is a killer on the loose,” Patsy memorably said at the time. “I don’t know who it is, I don’t know if it’s a he or a she. But if I were a resident of Boulder, I would tell my friends to keep your babies close to you. There’s someone out there.”Following the Ramseys’ interview, then-Boulder Mayor Leslie Durgin said on TV that there was no visible sign of forced entry at the Ramsey residence and the cops were saying, based on where JonBenét’s body was found, that “someone had to know the house. So, there isn’t a crazed killer on the loose wandering the streets of Boulder.”Listening to Durgin, “You would assume that she had information from the police that led her to feel comfortable saying that,” recalled KMGH Denver investigative reporter Julie Hayden in the Netflix series, explaining why authorities’ behavior in those early days also contributed to the cloud of suspicion growing around John and Patsy. The “implication from that clearly would be that it was somebody connected with the family.”

    Helen H. Richardson/ The Denver Post

    Accusations That the Ramseys’ Grieving Was StagedJournalist McKinley recalled in the series thinking that the Ramseys made “an orchestrated appearance” at a Jan. 5, 1997, memorial for their daughter in Boulder. “It didn’t seem sincere to me and it was almost like a performance,” she added, singling out Patsy’s big black sunglasses and all-black attire as a particularly notable touch.John barely remembered that day “’cause we were in shock, frankly,” he said in the series, but any accusation that aspects of it were staged was “absolutely false.”

    Axel Koester/Sygma via Getty Images

    Information Run AmokLocal media were getting a lot of information from law enforcement sources, often crediting just one source if that’s all they could get, several journalists noted in the series. And not all of it was factual.Charlie Brennan of the Rocky Mountain News admitted getting it wrong when he reported for the paper that John, a licensed pilot, had flown JonBenét’s coffin to Atlanta in his own plane.”That was inaccurate,” he said in the Netflix series. “It came from a source that I thoroughly trusted and had given me other solid information. That information was wrong, my source was wrong in that case, and that was a mistake.”

    Axel Koester/Sygma via Getty Images

    DNA Results Go UnreportedThe Colorado Bureau of Investigation’s report stating that unidentified male DNA found on JonBenét’s underwear and under her fingernails did not match her father or her then-10-year-old brother Burke Ramsey came back on Jan. 15, 1997. But police didn’t share the findings right away—not even with prosecutors.Police “were told that in January,” John said in the series. “They kept that secret from the media and from the District Attorney for months.”Stranger still, investigative reporter Woodward observed in the series, was that the info didn’t leak to the media. “DNA results often leak in murder cases,” she said, “yet when the one piece of evidence that clears them, or at least clears their DNA, comes back, there’s not a leak about it.”But, Woodward noted, early in the investiation there was “massive police leaking that Patsy Ramsey had written the ransom note.” (The theory was duly reported on; multiple handwriting experts determined her writing and the letter did not match, retired Det. Whitson recalled in the series.)”They kept that secret,” John said of the DNA findings, “because it conflicted with their conclusion that we were the killers.”

    MARIO TAMA/AFP via Getty Images

    Police vs. ProsecutorsBoulder Police Det. Steve Thomas took over leading the investigation into JonBenét’s death in early 1997 and he zeroed in on her parents. In his 2000 book, JonBenét: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, he detailed his theory that Patsy killed her daughter in a rage after the 6-year-old wet the bed, staged the scene in the basement and wrote the ransom note. He also said this to Patsy and John’s faces on an episode of CNN’s Larry King Live. They vehemently pushed back, Patsy ultimately saying, “God knows [what happened], and the truth is going to prevail.” (The Ramseys filed an $80 million defamation lawsuit against Thomas and his publisher in 2001; it was settled for an undisclosed sum.)In the Netflix series, John said that Steve’s theory “didn’t pass the sanity test.””Patsy had just recovered from stage 4 ovarian cancer,” John said. “She was grateful to be alive. Do you think that her child wetting her bed would be a big deal? No. She was happy to be alive and to have some more time with her children.”Steve Thomas resigned from the case in protest in August 1998, accusing the district attorney’s office of mishandling the Ramsey case. In a 2004 interview, Boulder County District Attorney Alex Hunter reflected on “a split” between his office and Boulder PD, noting, “Some Boulder Police people thought they knew who did it. And some of my people were convinced that it was an intruder that did it.”

    Erik S. Lesser/Liaison

    The Ramseys’ New ChampionIn 1997, the DA’s office brought in retired detective Lou Smit to consult on the case. Smit died in 2010, but he detailed in video and audio diaries sampled in the Netflix series why he believed the Ramseys were innocent.There was “no motive, no evidence of bad character,” he said in a 1998 recording, per the series. “There is evidence of an intruder. I say this over and over and over again. Nobody wants to listen.”So when prosecutors opted to take their case against the Ramseys to the grand jury in September 1998, Smit tendered his resignation from the case.”He would have no part in trying to convict an innocent couple,” Colorado Springs Police Department Investigations Commander Kurt Pillar, who considered Smit a mentor, said in the Netflix series. “That’s how strongly he felt about this case.”John recalled in the series, “We fully expected and were prepared to be indicted. ‘Cause they were saying, ‘You can indict a ham sandwich in front a grand jury,’ it’s a one-sided argument.”

    MARK LEFFINGWELL/AFP via Getty Images

    More than a year later, District Attorney Hunter announced on Oct. 13, 1999, that his office didn’t have the evidence to file charges against the Ramseys—or anyone—at that time.He did not share the grand jury’s recommendation with the public. “I feel at peace and to some extent proud of the fact that I weathered the storm and did the right thing,” Hunter said in 2004, “based on the evidence.”In 2008, his successor Mary Lacy publicly exonerated John, Patsy and Burke, citing the results of new touch DNA analysis. “To the extent that we may have contributed in any way to the public perception that you might have been involved in this crime, I am deeply sorry,” the DA wrote in a letter to John, per NBC News.It wasn’t until 2013 that the indictment was unsealed, revealing that the grand jury chose to indict John and Patsy on two counts each of child abuse resulting in death. Per the Denver Post, the document didn’t accuse them of killing their daughter, but rather of permitting her to be placed in a dangerous situation that led to her death and of assisting a person who “committed and was suspected of the crime of murder in the first degree and child abuse resulting in death.”

    SplashNews.com

    “We didn’t know who did what,” a member of the grand jury told the Boulder Daily Camera in January 2013. “But we felt the adults in the house may have done something that they certainly could have prevented, or they could have helped her, and they didn’t.”After the 1999 indictment was revealed, Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner said in a statement that it proved “the investigation pursued by the Boulder Police Department was, in fact, based on the information and evidence available.””There are no new leads,” the statement continued. “While we believe at this point it is unlikely there will ever be a prosecution, the Boulder Police Department still holds out some hope that one day the district attorney and the Boulder Police Department will be able to put together a case worthy of presenting to a jury.”The Ramseys’ attorney Lin Wood said in 2013, per the Post, that the grand jury’s decision in 1999 was “based on incomplete evidence.”“It’s subject to the impression that criminal charges were warranted against the Ramseys,” he said. “A full examination of the evidence unquestionably exonerates the Ramseys. This is inflicting a terrible miscarriage of justice.”

     ​ 

    Share.
    Unknown's avatar

    Related Posts

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply