An SFU study indicates that freedom of choice is a far more accurate indicator of one’s satisfaction with life than any other factors
Article content
It wouldn’t be far off to call Jason Payne “Dr. Happy.”
Article content
It is, after all, the subject of his post-doctoral studies at Simon Fraser University, where he turns data and information from surveys and interviews into statistical modelling of “well-being trajectories.” It’s a subject that has long fascinated him.
Article content
Article content
Example A: One of the first questions he posed to his girlfriend while on a date was “are you happy?”
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
It resulted in a marriage going on 10 years and three — soon to be four — children. “I’m not sure why that went over well, but it worked out,” he said, chuckling.
Article content
Sunrise
Article content
The elusive answer of what lies at the end of the pursuit of happiness has been debated for thousands of years. Even to this day, Payne saw many of his peers arguing, talking over each other, and espousing different schools of thought.
Article content
They usually coalesced around either hedonistic (the pursuit of pleasure, and less pain) or eudaemonic (seeking happiness through purpose or meaning in life) philosophies, he said.
Article content
It prompted Payne to do a study, recently published in The Journal of Positive Psychology, that tested these doctrines. He and his researchers surveyed more than 1,200 adults from Canada and the U.K.
Article content
What he found in his research was, that while both those viewpoints have merit either alone or combination, there was another factor that stood out.
Article content
“When people step back and evaluate whether their life is going well, they consider more than their emotional balance sheet,” he said. “They appear to ask themselves not just ‘do I feel good?’ but also ‘am I free?’”
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
His study, titled ‘Beyond hedonism: life satisfaction requires autonomy independent of affect,’ found that autonomy and the freedom to make one’s own choices is a far superior gauge in predicting “life satisfaction.”
Article content
Read More
-
World happiness rankings: Is social media a reason behind Canada’s drop to its lowest score ever?
-
Conversations That Matter: Why happiness matters
-
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
Article content
Payne said the questions posed were direct and not open-ended, because “the problem with open-ended questions is (people) lie, they exaggerate, they delude themselves.”
Article content
Instead, they were asked things like: ‘In the past four weeks, how sad have you been? How angry have you been? How often do you feel good?
Article content
The answers measured people’s positive and negative feelings, their life satisfaction and three psychological traits: autonomy, competence and relatedness (feeling close and connected to others). It allowed them to collate the answers and use advanced statistical modelling to determine what influenced people’s satisfaction the most.
Article content
Autonomy stood out as the universal factor, while others could fluctuate in importance among people.
Article content
“What was really interesting about this need, the psychological need for freedom, was people seem to be drawing from that beyond the pleasant and unpleasant feelings,” Payne said. “We see that people do care if they’re happy or sad, but when they’re making their judgments (of happiness), they seem to be relying on how free they were to choose their situation above and beyond how it made them feel.
