Close Menu
    What's Hot

    FSU Football at Pitt: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    November 14, 2026

    CIF Southern Section Football Quarterfinal Playoff Scores (Divisions 1-14)

    November 14, 2026

    Mississippi High School Football Playoff Final Scores, Results – November 13

    November 14, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
    TheBullPost
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Subscribe
    • International
    • Politics
    • Crime
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
      • Music
      • Movie
      • Gaming
      • Literature
    • continents
      • Africa
      • America
      • Asia
      • Australia
      • Europe
    • Tech
    • Top Trending
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Lifestyle
      • Fashion
      • food
      • Health
      • Travel
    TheBullPost
    Home»Sports»4 Reasons Why The Spurs Were So Dominant Against Warriors In 123-85 Victory
    Sports

    4 Reasons Why The Spurs Were So Dominant Against Warriors In 123-85 Victory

    soreceryBy soreceryNovember 14, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link

    The San Antonio Spurs had one of their most convincing performances of the season, dismantling the Golden State Warriors 123-85 in a game that was decided well before the final buzzer. Victor Wembanyama controlled the interior and had his MVP-level two-way play shine.

    Stephon Castle orchestrated the offense, and San Antonio overwhelmed Golden State with its combination of size, athleticism, and defensive intensity.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    The Spurs finished with a massive 60-43 rebounding advantage, scored 56 points in the paint, and recorded 34 assists while holding the Warriors to just 33.3% shooting from the field. Golden State never led, and San Antonio’s largest advantage reached 43 points.

    Here are four reasons why the Spurs were so dominant against the Warriors.

    Stephon Castle was arguably the biggest offensive difference-maker in this matchup.

    The Spurs guard finished with 32 points on 12-18 shooting, including five three-pointers on eight attempts. He also contributed six assists, five rebounds, and a block while committing just one turnover.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Castle’s efficiency was particularly impressive considering how much responsibility he carried offensively. He consistently converted his opportunities while helping San Antonio maintain its offensive rhythm.

    His performance complemented the Spurs’ interior dominance perfectly. Golden State had no reliable answer for Castle’s scoring, and his ability to create offense helped San Antonio establish an overwhelming advantage early.

    Wembanyama didn’t need an enormous scoring performance to completely influence the game.

    The Spurs superstar finished with 12 points, 12 rebounds, six assists, two steals, and two blocks in just 21 minutes. His defensive presence helped San Antonio control the paint while his passing contributed to the team’s impressive offensive movement.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Golden State scored only 28 points in the paint, compared to San Antonio’s 56. That 28-point difference illustrates just how thoroughly the Spurs controlled the interior.

    Wembanyama’s combination of rim protection, rebounding, and playmaking made him an enormous advantage even without a high-volume scoring night.

    The Spurs played exceptionally unselfish basketball.

    San Antonio recorded 34 assists on 46 made field goals, demonstrating how effectively the team generated quality scoring opportunities. Golden State finished with just 23 assists on 31 made shots.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    The difference extended beyond passing numbers. San Antonio shot 48.4% from the field, while Golden State struggled to convert just 33.3% of its attempts.

    Devin Vassell, De’Aaron Fox, Dylan Harper, and Castle all contributed to the offensive structure, while Harrison Barnes and Keldon Johnson provided additional production off the bench.

    The Spurs consistently found better offensive opportunities, and Golden State never established the defensive consistency necessary to slow them down.

    San Antonio’s dominance was perhaps most evident in the rebounding and transition numbers.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    The Spurs grabbed 60 rebounds, including 15 offensive boards, compared to Golden State’s 43 total rebounds. That advantage gave San Antonio additional possessions while limiting the Warriors’ ability to generate second-chance opportunities.

    The Spurs also scored 21 fast-break points, compared to just three for Golden State.

    San Antonio’s seven steals and seven blocks further demonstrated its defensive activity, while the Warriors struggled to find consistent offensive rhythm.

    With a 56-28 advantage in points in the paint and a 60-43 edge on the boards, the Spurs completely controlled the physical aspects of the game.

     

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

    Like this:

    Like Loading…
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
    Unknown's avatar
    sorecery
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Trail Blazers beat Kings 120-107 in NBA Cup play for third straight win

    November 14, 2026

    Ratliff, tenacious 'D' send New Lexington into regional final

    November 14, 2026

    Jonathan Law tops Lyman Hall on Witteman-to-Moulton TD pass with 56.8 seconds left

    November 14, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Economy News

    FSU Football at Pitt: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    By soreceryNovember 14, 2026

    ​ The Florida State Seminoles traveled to Pittsburgh, PA, to face the Pitt Panthers in…

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

    Like this:

    Like Loading…

    CIF Southern Section Football Quarterfinal Playoff Scores (Divisions 1-14)

    November 14, 2026

    Mississippi High School Football Playoff Final Scores, Results – November 13

    November 14, 2026
    Top Trending

    FSU Football at Pitt: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    By soreceryNovember 14, 2026

    ​ The Florida State Seminoles traveled to Pittsburgh, PA, to face the…

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

    Like this:

    Like Loading…

    CIF Southern Section Football Quarterfinal Playoff Scores (Divisions 1-14)

    By soreceryNovember 14, 2026

    ​ A score list by division of all the CIF Southern Section…

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

    Like this:

    Like Loading…

    Mississippi High School Football Playoff Final Scores, Results – November 13

    By soreceryNovember 14, 2026

    ​ The 2026 Mississippi high school football playoffs rolled on Friday, and…

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

    Like this:

    Like Loading…
    Advertisement
    TheBullPost
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact us
    • Terms of Service: The Bull Post
    © 2026 The Bull Post. Designed by Sorecery.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d